Quote:
Originally Posted by canthetuna
they're neck and neck in yards and tds (with portis having the edge in yards over all of them) and portis started the year splitting time with betts, played behind an o line completely wrecked with injuries, and they all have the advantage of playing against defenses that will consistently protect against a deep ball... whereas all of the defenses we face know we want to pound the ball... may as well be facing 4-5 fronts and still getting the job done. That's the only reason he doesn't have the YPC... well, that and the fact that he hasn't been healthy in two years... 2 weeks ago he had his first two consecutive days at practice in almost 2 full years...
You're entitled to your opinion, but I think you couldn't be any farther from reason.
|
Portis' YPC in Washington: A respectable 4.09 (4.2 this season)
Westbrook's YPC in Philly: An obsured 4.7! (4.8 this season!)
Barber in Dallas: 4.6 YPC (5.4!!!!! this season)
And for kicks, Jacobs is averaging 5.6 YPC this year as a starter.
You can make all the excuses you want for the guy, but you might as well save them. The point is not to show how ineffective Portis is. His production levels here have
always been very respectable.
The point is that the "reason" you speak of definitely supports my case. The three teams in our division all have great running games, and we do not. The back is only a percentage of that running game, but the biggest percentage. Portis just hasn't been as effective as the other three guys. He just hasn't. That's not really my opinion, that's easy to see.
My opinion is that going foward, those three guys will continue to average higher than Portis because they are quicker and/or more powerful runners with better vision.