Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

FRPLG · 11-12-2007, 01:12 AM

I have been toying with the notion that outside of Moss' first year here he looks more like a deadly slot guy than a #1. To me a speed guy and game breaker like him should be downfield busting up secondaries or getting WR screens. Not being relied on as the go to guy play in and play out. He isn't a possession guy and isn't as dominant as I'd like in a #1. I still think is great when healthy but I just thinks he fits better in a supporting type roll. I'd even move ARE to #1 where he can run slants and mid outs and hooks and let Moss press the secondary it just seems like a better fit to me. He certainly doesn't fit the traditional mold of a #1.

11-12-2007, 01:12 AM	#11
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss? I have been toying with the notion that outside of Moss' first year here he looks more like a deadly slot guy than a #1. To me a speed guy and game breaker like him should be downfield busting up secondaries or getting WR screens. Not being relied on as the go to guy play in and play out. He isn't a possession guy and isn't as dominant as I'd like in a #1. I still think is great when healthy but I just thinks he fits better in a supporting type roll. I'd even move ARE to #1 where he can run slants and mid outs and hooks and let Moss press the secondary it just seems like a better fit to me. He certainly doesn't fit the traditional mold of a #1.