Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUNRA
What does a QB have to do with a running back's inability to get a 100yds. How many back handoffs has Brunell given Portis? Maybe 1 in five games. Your'e focusing on one player and you're not looking at the total offense that sucks. The long pass is a low percentage play because of the threat of double coverage. If Brunell is struggling with the long pass, then Ramsey has f#%ked up on the short pass. He has overthrown passes and thrown INTS in the endzone, something Brunell has not done this year. The TD to Cooley wasn't an easy feat. The reality is there are no real Redskins on offense. I mean a player with the fire like Smoot and Arrrington on defense. Coles and Gardner are as consistent as the Florida ballots. Ramsey couldn't come back in one game, now how do you think he's going to come back three games down?
|
I respectfully disagree. I am looking at the big picture of the whole offense that sucks. Mark Brunell cannot throw the football well, to anyone. Teams realize this, and that is why they go with very basic coverage, and run schemes to stop the run. That is why the Quarterback has everything to do with Portis's inability to gain yards. No one respects our pass, that is why we can not run. Until we make teams pay for not putting enough of their gameplan on our passing game, they are going to be able to stop the run. Personally, I feel that Ramsey gives us a better chance for our passing game to succeed. I feel he has a better arm, he will take the chances that Brunell is not willing to take. I understand that he is going to throw picks, and some of them might be costly. However, I feel the risk is worth the reward. Brunell hasent done anything to win us any football games, and he has done everything to help us lose them.