Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
The only problem with that, GTripp, is that not all areas provide alternate forms of transportation. Would you be assuming that areas where people are close enough to work where they could walk or could take the bus should not have vehicles? Wouldn't this be in direct conflict with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?
|
Well, the people who are dependant on gas to get to their jobs would still pay double for gas. They would have to. The trade off is they can be somewhat assured that it will be there at that fixed price down the road, because the others who have options not to drive are not using more fuel than they need.
With demand down universally, the value of gas would stop the exponential increase it is headed at.
A lot of people would feel like they are getting screwed. In the mean time though, we're all screwing ourselves.