Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR...

scafuri27 · 02-14-2008, 05:14 PM

Not buying it.. 6'2 220 pound WR with NFL expirience (8 years)??? How did that work out for the Bengals when they took Michael Westbrook (6'3 220 lbs) in 2002?..

Look at these stats after 8 years
Porter--284 catches 3900 yards 30 tds

Westbrook--285 catches 4300 yards 26 tds... Porter IMO wouldnt even be a band-aid at this point.. we should draft or try for #85.

Porter=Westbrook... and that aint good!

02-14-2008, 05:14 PM	#9
scafuri27 Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Agawam, Massachusetts Posts: 132	Re: Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR... Not buying it.. 6'2 220 pound WR with NFL expirience (8 years)??? How did that work out for the Bengals when they took Michael Westbrook (6'3 220 lbs) in 2002?.. Look at these stats after 8 years Porter--284 catches 3900 yards 30 tds Westbrook--285 catches 4300 yards 26 tds... Porter IMO wouldnt even be a band-aid at this point.. we should draft or try for #85. Porter=Westbrook... and that aint good! __________________ The 8th rule of fight club is..If this is your first night at FIGHT CLUB, you HAVE to fight.