View Single Post
Old 02-14-2008, 05:39 PM   #15
dcweldon
Camp Scrub
 
dcweldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA/Easton, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 65
Re: Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR...

Quote:
Originally Posted by scafuri27 View Post
Not buying it.. 6'2 220 pound WR with NFL expirience (8 years)??? How did that work out for the Bengals when they took Michael Westbrook (6'3 220 lbs) in 2002?..

Look at these stats after 8 years
Porter--284 catches 3900 yards 30 tds

Westbrook--285 catches 4300 yards 26 tds... Porter IMO wouldnt even be a band-aid at this point.. we should draft or try for #85.

Porter=Westbrook... and that aint good!
Do not compare Mike Westbrook to Joey Porter, there is a huge difference Mike didn't have any class as a person or a player. Comparing stats is one thing, but we have seen guys revive their careers with a location change...aka, Santana Moss
dcweldon is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.10594 seconds with 10 queries