Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins8588
I see what you are trying to say, every story has 2 sides which side is Johnsons? Here are his stats for games that he had to start for either Boldin or Fitzgerald.
FILLING IN FOR BOLDIN:
WK4 vs. PITT 4rec. 40yds. 0TD's
WK5 @ STL 6rec. 80yds. 0TD's
WK6 vs. CAR 4rec. 29yds. 0TD's
WK14 @ SEA 1rec. 5yds. 1TD
FILLING IN FOR FITZGERALD:
WK13 vs. CLE 6rec. 56yds. 1TD
And you can look up on NFL.COM for the rest of last season stats for Johnson , but the question remains...
Is he a good WR stuck behind 2 pro-bowlers, or is he nothing more than an average 3rd WR?
|
Math is your friend:
Those 5 games extrapolated to a 16-game season, making the assumption he'd start for 16 games, that would translate into:
67 Catches, 672 Yards, 6.4 TDs (as the #2 WR on the team, after all, either Boldin or Fitz were on the field the whole time opposite Johnson).
That's a nice possession receiver and a big RZ target, given that Moss would still be your #1 and Randle-El would look real nice in the slot. And you'd end up paying Johnson like the #3 WR on our team (he'd make less than Moss & ARE).
Seems like the perfect thing for our WCO.
Anyone who thinks we're going to magically acquire a WR not named Chad Johnson or Randy Moss, and who will put up over 1000 yards for us is delusional. Bryant Johnson would fit in real well, especially for the money.
I think DJ Hackett is capable of very similar production and is probably a better fit given familiarity with Zorn. But Johnson is exactly the kind of guy we need.