Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

backrow · 03-24-2004, 12:08 PM

That's only one Mock! Try over at Hailredskins.com. 108 Mocks, and the largest Mock Data Base in NFL Fandom! When you think about it, all Mocks do is give you the names of the potential draftees and some Mocks have a pretty good reputation. But don't give them a lot of credit except the Names. Those names are interchangeable to any point on Draft day. Everything depends on Best Available player philosophy vs. Draft Needs! I've seen Taylor, Winslow, and Trade down all used in the same sentence in the Washington Post, which I believe is the closest indicator to the heartbeat of the collective braintrust at the Redskins FO! I've even thought about using the percentage philosophy. You know, how many times is S. Taylors name shown as the #5 pick from those 108 Mocks! Nah, nobody would do that, would they?

03-24-2004, 12:08 PM	#14
backrow The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: 36.28 x 76.22 Age: 73 Posts: 1,812	That's Only One Mock! That's only one Mock! Try over at Hailredskins.com. 108 Mocks, and the largest Mock Data Base in NFL Fandom! When you think about it, all Mocks do is give you the names of the potential draftees and some Mocks have a pretty good reputation. But don't give them a lot of credit except the Names. Those names are interchangeable to any point on Draft day. Everything depends on Best Available player philosophy vs. Draft Needs! I've seen Taylor, Winslow, and Trade down all used in the same sentence in the Washington Post, which I believe is the closest indicator to the heartbeat of the collective braintrust at the Redskins FO! I've even thought about using the percentage philosophy. You know, how many times is S. Taylors name shown as the #5 pick from those 108 Mocks! Nah, nobody would do that, would they? __________________ '37, '42, '83, '88, '92. Championship!