Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

That Guy · 05-31-2008, 01:20 AM

he is competition, and he definitely has the edge (brooks that is), but just in case he s#$%# the bed, you need insurance, and in camp, you need multiple punters anyways, just like you always sign a couple extra QBs for WR route practice purposes.

i'm up on brooks and i know frost doesn't have trade value (remember, he wouldn't sign with us because he wanted to test the market? and then no one even made an offer...)

for the 53 man roster, unless brooks is hurt or just looks terrible, he should be the only punter, since releasing frost is no big deal (he'll be waiting by the phone just in case we need him later anyways).

05-31-2008, 01:20 AM	#22
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,620	Re: Brooks vs. Frost and 80 is Enough(?) he is competition, and he definitely has the edge (brooks that is), but just in case he s#$%# the bed, you need insurance, and in camp, you need multiple punters anyways, just like you always sign a couple extra QBs for WR route practice purposes. i'm up on brooks and i know frost doesn't have trade value (remember, he wouldn't sign with us because he wanted to test the market? and then no one even made an offer...) for the 53 man roster, unless brooks is hurt or just looks terrible, he should be the only punter, since releasing frost is no big deal (he'll be waiting by the phone just in case we need him later anyways).