Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

DragoJT87 · 11-05-2004, 05:14 PM

This brings up an interesting point. More than one person in here has jocked R. Gardner as a great player. Granted, he's played well, when absolutlely necessary. He's made some spectacular catches(diving, jumpballs, red zone, etc.), but what about the routine grabs? Isn't that the role of a #3 receiver? 3 catches for 41 yds. and 2 TDs sounds like a Redzone Receiver, not a Possesion man. I'm not saying that McCants is better for the team or even a better receiver or that any of this is Gardner's fault, but when a #2 receiver is virtually doing what an uneffective, inactive, non-practice player is capable of, there is more wrong than we are seeing. LC #1, TJ #2, #3 is a toss-up.

11-05-2004, 05:14 PM	#12
DragoJT87 Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: So. Md. Age: 45 Posts: 32	This brings up an interesting point. More than one person in here has jocked R. Gardner as a great player. Granted, he's played well, when absolutlely necessary. He's made some spectacular catches(diving, jumpballs, red zone, etc.), but what about the routine grabs? Isn't that the role of a #3 receiver? 3 catches for 41 yds. and 2 TDs sounds like a Redzone Receiver, not a Possesion man. I'm not saying that McCants is better for the team or even a better receiver or that any of this is Gardner's fault, but when a #2 receiver is virtually doing what an uneffective, inactive, non-practice player is capable of, there is more wrong than we are seeing. LC #1, TJ #2, #3 is a toss-up.