Thread: Mason v. Rock
View Single Post
Old 08-05-2008, 10:34 AM   #37
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,975
Re: Mason v. Rock

Mason is good enough to keep on the roster, no doubt.
They need to find a way to keep him.

Perhaps they should have him trying to return kicks or punts or something.
Keep in mind that Mason did very well with the draws that Zorn was calling...he is quicker than Rock for our new offense.
Rock is old school Gibbs....yes he's decent, but Mason fits the scheme better...kinda like a poor man's westbrook....
If he catches well...something we don't know yet....he could actually be a viable 3rd and long back...I just don't see Rock in that situation.

Rock cannot be cut...he is a must keep with special teams and a key team player...kinda like a Thrash...only younger...so that means to keep Mason, he must be able to play teams....
It is entirely possible if Mason returns kicks well with Rock, that may eliminate the need for Thrash....I'd keep my eye on this
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.80014 seconds with 10 queries