Thread: Mason v. Rock
View Single Post
Old 08-07-2008, 07:38 AM   #2
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
Re: Mason v. Rock

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Sure about that? I haven't looked at all the position scenarios, but I've thought all along that they might make it work to keep 6 wr's for 3 reasons:
1) injuries; we're already seeing the hamstring problems & it's a position that has frequent injury problems & has been in the past (Moss)
2) Both Mix & Thrash play spec teams & play it well. Don't know if they'd have the #4 wr play teams, but that would make it even more feasible to keep 6.
3) Solid Depth; the potential of all these wideouts combined w/Thrash's value to the team might allow them to keep 6. Zorn is an offensive guy too.
Keeping six wideouts means there would only be room for one fullback, and that's not going to happen for a West Coast offense.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.90343 seconds with 10 queries