Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan
So Buster after 22 nationally televised debates, countless interviews, two books authored by the candidate, a website with a litany of specific details on energy, the economy, healthcare, woman's reproductive health care rights, education and college tuition, benefits for our veterans, and yes, foreign policy. You mean to tell me that you don't have one iota of what Obama is talking about?
By the way, in terms of exiting Iraq, it looks like the time table is somewhere around 2011.
|
He consistently changes his positions on a weekly basis...so no. Most people do not know what he stands for (currently).
The majority of his short time in the Senate consisted of voting "present" so he wouldn't have to take a stand.
His "glorious" speeches are like sermons, speaking in platitudes of "hope" and "change".
He refused to debate Clinton late in the primaries and is limiting his debates with McCain to only 3. Why? Probably because he's a horrible speaker without a teleprompter. He's a talented speech reader, but stutters and rambles until an idea arises in debates and interviews.
Barack Obama's policy switches are giving the Left whiplash
The Democratic nominee's policy pivots are causing anguish among liberals. He is no fool -
Barack Obama's policy switches are giving the Left whiplash | Gerard Baker - Times Online
An example of one of his many lies:
Townhall.com - Printer Friendly
Quote:
|
Sen. Barack Obama is reaching out to new sources, including Washington insiders whose influence he has vowed to end. Obama is now using lists of contributors to Democratic congressional chairmen, primarily lobbyists of both parties.
|
From Obama's own website:
Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Ethics
Quote:
|
A High Standard: Unlike other candidates Obama's campaign refuses to accept contributions from Washington lobbyists and political action committees.
|
Speaking of his website, it was reported before some debates that he removed and/or changed many issues that may have caused criticism.
He's not a revolutionary candidate. He's more of the same, possibly a worse than usual politician.
Bonus: for everyone who claims that Republicans are "in the pocket of 'Big Oil'" -
Report: Exxon Execs Gave More to Obama | The Trail | washingtonpost.com
Another VERY interesting and alarming read:
American Thinker: Obama's Foreign Donors: The media averts its eyes