Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

freddyg12 · 09-05-2008, 11:25 AM

I tried to read all of these posts but have to much work to do, so forgive me if I repeat something from another post.

Mike Wise's article in today's wash post really puts JC's dilema in perspective. He's in his 4th year & at a time when he's expected to realize his potential & have that 'break out year.' On the other hand, he's not only in a new system again, he's got a rookie head coach that has never called plays in the nfl before.

I understand people that say he's paid to perfom no matter what. That's true, but it doesn't make it any easier for him to have so many changes. My view of it is, why put it all on JC, the O looked bad in several respects other than some solid running plays.

Last night's problems unfortunately look to go well beyond JC.

09-05-2008, 11:25 AM	#150
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: JC is not what I thought. I tried to read all of these posts but have to much work to do, so forgive me if I repeat something from another post. Mike Wise's article in today's wash post really puts JC's dilema in perspective. He's in his 4th year & at a time when he's expected to realize his potential & have that 'break out year.' On the other hand, he's not only in a new system again, he's got a rookie head coach that has never called plays in the nfl before. I understand people that say he's paid to perfom no matter what. That's true, but it doesn't make it any easier for him to have so many changes. My view of it is, why put it all on JC, the O looked bad in several respects other than some solid running plays. Last night's problems unfortunately look to go well beyond JC.