Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
I would love to have them both...but if the redskins are making a choice to only give one of them a long term deal then I think it should be Rogers following next season. I also do not think Hall is worth the kind of deal that is being rumored. He does not deserve to be paid as one of the top CB's in the league after the season he had last year.
|
Why Rogers and not Hall? Is Hall that terrible? Did you see him play? I just don't get why people are so anti-Hall. You think we were trying to pick between Smoot and Rogers.
I think any reasonable person would first and foremost want to have both Rogers and Hall back. Rogers is good with coverage, but he doesn't get the INTs. Hall gets the picks. We b!tch and whine about having a good defense, but not having many sacks. Why aren't we complaining about having a good defense and not having that many picks??