Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Brave
For the Vick Haters...his on the field is better than any QB we have had since Rip...no excuse for this off the field...Vick equals +2 plus wins for you team, he is not coming here so probably not worth the debate.
|
1.) Compare Vicks 05 Stats to Brunell
Passing Stats
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2001 ATL 8 50 113 44.2 785 6.9 2 52 3 62.7
2002 ATL 15 231 421 54.9 2936 7.0 16 74 8 81.6
2003 ATL 5 50 100 50.0 585 5.9 4 49 3 69.0
2004 ATL 15 181 321 56.4 2313 7.2 14 62 12 78.1
2005 ATL 15 214 387 55.3 2412 6.2 15 58 13 73.1
2006 ATL 16 204 388 52.6 2474 6.4 20 55 13 75.7
Brunell
2004 WAS 9 118 237 49.8 1194 5.0 7 49 6 63.9
[B]
2005 WAS 16 262 454 57.7 3050 6.7 23 78 10 85.9
Yes, Mark Brunell was even better then Vick.
2.) No QB will be successful here with the lack of Oline that we have.