Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post - Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need?

GTripp0012 · 03-20-2009, 03:02 PM

This is more bizarrely hypothetical than the last thread.

Let's say the Skins were forbidden by an agreement in the CBA (or maybe just because Vinny feels like it) that they could not address OL, DE, or LB in the first round of the draft. Those are clearly our three biggest needs, but we have to wait around until the third round at the earliest to begin addressing them.

You can propose potential trade backs (or ups) in this thread, but you aren't allowed to suggest a player at one of our three primary needs until the third round at the earliest.

So, this is a what would your draft look like thread -- given the above -- with an emphasis on the 13th pick.

Have at it.

CLARIFICATION: You could say, "Michael Crabtree", but then you would have to explain why he fell or what you gave up to get him higher in the draft.

03-20-2009, 03:02 PM	#1
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need? This is more bizarrely hypothetical than the last thread. Let's say the Skins were forbidden by an agreement in the CBA (or maybe just because Vinny feels like it) that they could not address OL, DE, or LB in the first round of the draft. Those are clearly our three biggest needs, but we have to wait around until the third round at the earliest to begin addressing them. You can propose potential trade backs (or ups) in this thread, but you aren't allowed to suggest a player at one of our three primary needs until the third round at the earliest. So, this is a what would your draft look like thread -- given the above -- with an emphasis on the 13th pick. Have at it. CLARIFICATION: You could say, "Michael Crabtree", but then you would have to explain why he fell or what you gave up to get him higher in the draft. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.