Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat
Mack looks to be a solid player, but we would be incredibly foolish to take him at 13. I understand the man-crush some of you have on him, but if we selected him, we'd still have holes at starting RT, LB, and DE. Mack also doesnt fill one of our top 3 needs and using the 13th overall pick to fill a need that is probably 5th or 6th on our team makes no sense at all.
|
Just to play devil's advocate, I'll point out that if we pass on Mack for say, Tyson Jackson at No. 13, we would still have holes at C, RT, and LB. Basically, no matter who we take, we'll still have just as many holes.
Good post, though, and I do agree that there will
probably be much better options if we pick at 13 than Mack. I'm just not opposed to taking him ahead of projected slot of he's the best OL available.