Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Right, and the guy was obviously healthy enough to play.
Personally I'd like to know what the % risk of serious injury was. Was it 1%, 10%, 90%?
If it was something very high I doubt the team would have let him play. But if it was something on the low end I think it's got to be left up to the player.
|
That's my thought. I don't think the article had the proper context and quite honestly was a little alarmist. I just don't believe teh team would allow someone to realistically risk paralysis in an ongoing fashion.