Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25
better go back and re read the previous posts. it was my man trample
|
My main man DMEK, she brought it up in front of a meeting of La Raza, aka the race. So I can't see how race isn't an issue when she brought it up in front of a group named, The Race?
This apointment has identity politics written all over it. After she said she was more qualified than a white man because she was a poor Puerto Rican I needed nothing else.
What I see Obama or whoever came up with this lady doing was this, they looked for a particular race and gender and then saw if she was a good judge. I don't think she is. That's just my gut. She has Ruth Commie Ginsburg II written all over her.
The whole of my argument is that, they should see if a person is a good judge FIRST, and if he or she should be a blind homosexual Eskimo vegetarian, then so be it.
The last time I checked Alito isn't an Anglo Saxon Protestant, neither is Scalia or Thomas. In fact I don't see how Scalia isn't the first Latin Justice since Italians / Romans invented the language? How many Cherokee or Monacan Justices have we had? Oh that's right! They don't have a huge voting block.
Forgive me, but my dog needs a species sensitive brushing. Peace!