Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins
Some people seem to think he is the devil or something.
I was just listening to NPR and the person interviewed was a former nurse with Tiller and now a part of a pro-choice organization(so take it for what you feel it is worth, it is legit IMO). She was basically saying the vast majority of abortions performed were first trimester AND the majority of women were either rape victims or with fetus abnormalities(the mother's life in danger).
Also she made a good point countering those who claim he was in it for the money. This guy could have been a dr. in any other field in any other place, not the in the middle of nowhere. This guy apparently worm a bullet proof vest at most times because he knew his life was in danger. I guess he didn't during his slaying, but still it seems there weren't too many pluses in his line. She said he knew that abortions in certain instances are crucial for women. One of the abortions he performed was a 10 year old rape victim. Do you pro-lifers seriously think that abortion was not needed in that case?
Finally she was clear that he was a good guy but not a saint like the media is portraying him; according to her he was simply a good doctor(helped his patients feel comfortable, etc.).
In general the good guy stuff, etc. could be BS and the entire thing could be a bit bias but serveral news sources have mentioned what I did note in my 2nd paragraph. How can one justify murder, based on their political beliefs? I still don't believe how one can even not feel bad for the guy; that is terrible. I want a response to this post before some of you guys keep on ranting that he deserved it.
|
Perhaps Dr. Tiller received a personal sense of justification from providing a service to victims of rape. I don't believe there's a such thing as an unjustified abortion. Clearly, it's never an easy decision for the mother, regardless of the surrounding circumstances. And if he felt the right thing to do was provide the choice to people who otherwise would not have had an option, then I think you could argue that he was a good doctor doing good work and/or caring for his patients. That's one way to look at it.
But if dudes going to wear a bullet proof vest around town because he's in that much danger, based on political ideology, what do you want me to say when some nutjob kills him after multiple attempts on his life already? Clearly, his self-preservation instincts were either broken, or being suffocated by a perceived selflessness to a minority group.
If his former nurse is right, and he could have had a job anywhere, then the rational move would have been to take a job elsewhere when he first had an attempt on his life. Once you forfeit your right to safety, death becomes more inevitable than tragic.
Clearly, the only justification for not leaving the Wichita area was a perceived sense of moral justification in his actions. It's sort of ironic, isn't it? People wanted this man to lose his license because of a questionable moral compass, but the only rational justification for his actions is a higher sense of what is right. They can't both be right, now can they?
The only certainty appears to be that the party that committed the homicide is guilty of moral wrongdoing.