[saden1]

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

Ah yes....I'm feeling overweight and depressed, plus I'm not ready to take care of a child. I couldn't figure this out in the first or second tri-mester. So I know, I'll have a late term abortionist stick a needle into my 22+ week old babies heart to kill it with drugs, induce labor, and leave the dead baby....I feel much better now.

I'm sure that won't have any adverse effects on a young woman's mental health....not to mention the baby's.

What I find confusing is that you will defend the rights of terrorists (adult murderers) so they aren't confined unjustly or waterboarded (not executed), but yet find every excuse to defend the actions of an abortionist who has performed well over 1,000 late term abortions on viable fetuses (babies) when the mother's life was NOT at risk. I think your moral compass is a bit off or you're unwilling to concede a point that is counter to your liberal ideology or you're just trying to get a rise out of your conservative counterparts

Your confusion is self-inflected for I am rational and capable of articulating my position clearly. We always have options but the question is whether we choose the right option. As I have stated clearly on many occasions I oppose torture because there are other options and the fact that it is against the law. Similarly, I oppose late term abortions when the woman's life is not at risk due to physically or mentally ailment and if it was against the law I would oppose the practice. This is where the court of law comes into play. Furthermore, I have no problem with trying and putting to death terrorist who are found guilty in the court of law.

Yes, it's all that simple folks and if you take a moment to think it all through I am confidant you will see the consistency of my arguments.