Quote:
Originally Posted by GhettoDogAllStars
It's not impossible for the government to implement universal healthcare, but it's unreasonable to expect them to do it right? In other words, there is no way they can do it right. That is defeatist.
I'm not against looking at the failures, but when you never *ever* offer any positive ideas, and just keep saying why it won't work, that is defeatist. Also, it's lazy when you offer the reasons for failure "in the effort of prudence", but you never offer any advice about how it could work. In other words, you just want to examine the failures so you can continue to oppose Universal Healthcare. You don't want to examine to failures so you can correct them. That's lazy.
Why don't you come up with some positive ideas? How do you think it's possible for the government to take on such a huge financial burden? What would need to be sacrificed? I suspect your answers would be: What would need to be sacrificed?not possible and nothing.
Don't try and disguise your defeatist attitude with this crap. You know yourself that you're not interested in finding ways for it to work.
|
Why don't you come up with some positive ideas?
I just don't see any positives in this idea.
How do you think it's possible for the government to take on such a huge financial burden? To raise taxes over and over again to pay for a program that will run way over budget.
What would need to be sacrificed?
Higher cost and taxes.
not possible and nothing.
I don't think anyone here who is against the plan thinks its not possible its just that we feel its a bad idea.