Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl13
|
Well this thread might have some meaning if we knew he was there to talk with the FO about a contract for JC or if JC was his only client. Him just there would be stupid to debate because it would be based of nothing. Your thread title made it sound like he might be there for a reason and JC would be that reason but nothing points to that. You don't like it when someone points out that its a non issue but it just looks like a thread started to start a thread.