Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

JWsleep · 09-13-2009, 09:25 PM

What's odd is that JC had a slightly better QB rating (93.6 vs 93.5) than Eli. They both had a fumble, a pick, and a TD. But JCs fumble went for a TD, the gints had better yardage, and they had much better ToP. What's really weird is how statistically close--and close on the scoreboard--this game was, but watching it, I never felt we had a chance. We just looked like losers out there.

Gotta start believing. The gints are not that good, but they NEVER beat themselves, and they just believe that we are not a real threat. And they seem to be right. I HATE that.

09-13-2009, 09:25 PM	#17
JWsleep Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 56 Posts: 4,719	Re: Offense = Disappointment What's odd is that JC had a slightly better QB rating (93.6 vs 93.5) than Eli. They both had a fumble, a pick, and a TD. But JCs fumble went for a TD, the gints had better yardage, and they had much better ToP. What's really weird is how statistically close--and close on the scoreboard--this game was, but watching it, I never felt we had a chance. We just looked like losers out there. Gotta start believing. The gints are not that good, but they NEVER beat themselves, and they just believe that we are not a real threat. And they seem to be right. I HATE that. __________________ Hail from Houston!