Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Depends on how you define meddle. Most owners have various levels of involvement.
Would you be ok with Snyder's involvement if he just comes out and says "Moving forward, I am taking the title of General Manager"
|
I would appreciate the honesty of such an announcement. That would beat an owner who acts as GM in secret.
I disagree with Tucker when he says, "If you were the owner of an NFL team, would you take a backseat and decline to have significant input on all of the football decisions? I didn't think so." At my job I have hired others who have expertise in fields that I don't. Even though I could get involved with their work, I don't at all - I let them be free to do their jobs as they see fit. After all, the reason they were hired is that they know things that I don't and from this point of view my meddling with their jobs would erase the reason for hiring them to begin with. Then again, I don't have $1 billion of mine on the line and we are not playing a game at my work. But I still think that the idea that owners inevitably will meddle holds no merit. In fact, projecting from my experience, the more an owner gets involved, the dumber he or she is.