Thread: gardner haters
View Single Post
Old 02-04-2005, 11:20 AM   #2
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 42
Posts: 8,341
How many times in the draft threads have people said "It really takes years for receivers to come around." Gardner is one of those receivers. He can make some big plays, and when Brunell was at QB got a lot more looks than Coles. Then when the QB changed, and we got a QB that could complete a wide open pass, Coles got more looks because I feel Ramsey really likes Coles.

Matty - it doesn't take a doctor to see how Coles' injury is hampering him. He's going much slower, and the WP had an article a while ago that mentioned without the surgery he probably won't be the same athelete again. I'm sure they did their research. Stop with the whole doctor thing, Coles is hurting and I can respect if he wants to forego surgery, but if he's sitting on the bench in two years, I don't wanna hear shit from the guy.

It is true how the fans and media liked to make excuses for EVERYONE but Rod Gardner, he took a brunt of the blame for the anemic Redskin offense, because god knows we can't blame Saint Joe Gibbs. You can only catch what's thrown to you, and the dropped balls between our top two wideouts were a lot more even than we want to admit.

I feel Rod Gardner certainly has his shortcomings, but the Redskins could do MUCH worse. I personally would rather see him stay, because I don't really like the WR prospects coming out of college this year, and he's pretty cheap (of course to trade him next year we'd have to franchise, etc) I agree, for the most part, with Jamf.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.42157 seconds with 10 queries