Re: ESPN: Clayton Expects Skins to Tender Campbell for a 1st and 3rd
Quote:
Originally Posted by redskins202
He's AVG............and come on...did you see his pick 6 against the Giants game?. How does he mis-throw a pass for a pick 6???does any body else make an mistake like that?
Candle. And its 70% chance because.
1: Bills-Rams-Vikes-Cards-Jags-Oak- all could use a QB who thinls can be good so look for one of them to atleast offer a 3rd.
2: If we go Bradford look for Campbell to not come back.
70% in my view. 0% unless Candle thinks he can perform for us as just a back up than yea sure.
|
I think you are exaggerating on Campbell's abilities, especially when you see analysts say thing like this...
NFL: The Carolina Panthers have depth problems at wide receiver - ESPN
Quote:
With Shanahan on board, Campbell finally would be fortunate enough to have some offensive stability in terms of the system, expectations and play-calling on a year-to-year basis. For once he wouldn't have to pick up a new language every offseason. Physically, Campbell has what it takes. He can move well enough to execute Shanahan's scheme, has a big strong arm to drive the ball down the field and is accurate enough. The tools are there, and he just had his best year as a starter. I contend that he could use a real confidence boost and some of the responsibility off his plate; he was simply asked to do way too much last year as nearly every aspect of the Redskins' offense crumbled around him. He was also sacked 43 times and was constantly under siege. But the beauty of sticking with Campbell is that the Redskins could then use the resources on building a quick zone-blocking offensive line and finding a ball carrier they can trust. Shanahan does have an impressive history of getting first-round production from mid-round running backs. I can live with the receiving corps that is in place and the defense.
|
__________________
R.I.P. #21
|