Quote:
Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07
I think he meant Starting Qb.
BTW I'll take the 3rd and the 5th. Or better yet the 3rd and Whitner.
|
the 3rd and Whitner would be great. I'm thinking that they are probably offering Whitner and a 5th, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII
I think we are on the same page. I'd rather see a low 1st round draft pick or second round draft pick for JC. Hell he was a starter and honestly his stats do look good. For teams who wish they could get a Cutler, JC has similar stats.
If the trade value is not good enough then instead of going out hunting down a Vet FA then keep JC and let the Rookie learn the play book better. But I get tired of the whole don't throw the Rookie in. Look at Baltimore their Rookie had an awsome season and did well last yr also, the Jets almost made it to the SB with their Rookie QB, the Falcons have had two decent years with a Rookie. I don't see any problem putting whoever we draft on the field if he is better then JC. Plus we have a back up plan if the Rookie does not work out.
|
i think you're overvaluing him a bit. Sage only got the texans a 3rd. Campbells a little better than him, but not by much. Also, would your feelings about letting Campbell go for a 3rd and conditional 5th in 2011 change if we draft a QB with the 4th overall pick, finish the 2010 season around 8-8, and Campbell walks away as free agent and we receive no compensation in return?
At that point, i think you'd be missing those two draft picks. I hate to break it to you, but this team is not going to be a contender in 2010. Since thats the case, there's no reason to keep ANY player for one year, when we could trade him for a 3rd round pick - a pick that would probably get us a future starting offensive linemen or running back.