Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359
Then come out and say that. No need to go into how important hand size is. I've seen it before, some people would just rather have Okung so any imperfection of other potential prospects gets blown up.
By the way which teams that have won the Super Bowl as of late had a dominant O-Line with multiple first rounders?
I've said this before but it's worth repeating. We had two bookend Tackles from 2000-early 2008 and a record below .500. In the end if Shanahan comes away thinking that Bradford or Clausen is a franchise QB we HAVE to take him.
Dude hand size isn't important, but a pro ball is thicker than a NCAA ball. The Danny Woeful thing was for fun. I am just playing. Same thing with Jimmy and his "hogs". I am sure USC Qbs take pics with anybody that asks. Just is crazy that Clausen is the only one with ugly gals.
History says no. If you luck out then in 2 or 3 years you MIGHT get Matt Schuab (a third rounder btw) but chances are you'll end up with Charlie Frye and thats if you get a hit.
It's wrong to patronize the draft a QB crowd (a crowd that I am not exactly a part of) with "oh you could still get your QB after round 1" The QB crowd would have a much easier time turning around and telling you that we could easily find a great tackle in round 4. In part because the starting LT of the Super Bowl champions is a 4th round draft pick as is the best guard in the game.
One more thing directed towards the "don't draft a QB crowd." What were your thoughts on the QB we drafted in 2005 on draft day?
|
Dude the Danny Woeful thing was a total joke. I am playing. But a NFL ball is not thinner than a NCAA ball. I don't want Clausen as our QB, and the bit about his small hands was funny and just another BS reason for me not to want him. Not to mention that he can't get a pic on the net with some babes. God Damn Tebow's babe is smokin!!! And as for my thoughts about JC back in 2005? Like any draftee, it is a gamble, and to be honest I thought Gibbs took a gamble on JC. JC and his Auburn team were stacked with 2 first round RBs and one helluva O line. Was it JC or was it because he was flodded with talent around him? That is why I am not so sure about the likes of a Tebow or Bradford. The NFL is all about parity these days, unless you are lucky to be on one of the elite teams left in the league. We should keep JC because he has survived many systems and does seem to be getting better statistically. Plus you have to think Collins is toast. I don't trust MR Hawaii at all. He was a cheap gamble for sure.