View Single Post
Old 03-17-2010, 12:01 PM   #26
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Texas wants to rewrite the US History books

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal View Post
Buster,

I think it's a stretch to say that there is no separation of church and state in law or founding documents. If you use that logic, there's very little in founding documents. They're very ambiguous, and were created that way for a reason. These laws are very open to interpretation which is what has made them so flexible to this day.

The correspondance you're speaking of was Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists which is said:


I think he makes his idea of what that law should stand for relatively obvious here.

Also, to say it's not in law is a fallacy as well. The Supreme Court used that exact phrase in one of their rulings.


Source: <3 Wikipedia.
Separation of church and state in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
well there are plenty of other supreme court rulings and/or mentions of it, mostly for separation but some not

either way it's hard to agree that the separation wouldn't be for the best
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.08524 seconds with 10 queries