Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus
I agree that taking a tackle high is generally safer than taking a QB high. That said, it is not perfectly safe.
But that is not my real argument here. My real argument is that we have sucked for some time, were especially bad last year, and have a new regime. Because of this, perhaps now is the time when we should be least worried about playing things safe. Maybe some draft daring is just what we need. Not stupid picks, of course, but not playing it safe, either.
|
Playing it safe is one way to look at it, but a clear, decisive plan for improvement at our weakest position would be another.
What frustrates me is when people say: let's
take a chance on a quarterback. There are a lot of people who have an irrational man crush on Sam Bradford, but at the very least, those people are convinced that if you do get him, the rest will fall into place. And as wrongheaded as I think the logic is, I can respect the sentiment.
If you're "taking a chance" on a guy that high, you're setting your team up for failure, I think. Some people believe the draft is a crapshoot. If the draft is a crapshoot, I don't think a QB at No. 4 can be defensed. You really do have to
know what you are getting this high. Which is why, in my mind,
taking a chance on Okung is not verbage I'd ever use. I prefer to look at it as
finding a way to land the guy who will make us better the fastest.