Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
So does this pave the way to take Suh/McCoy at #4 assuming one of them is there and Bradford and/or Okung are not? Because all this time I've been thinking, and I kind of still do, there's no point really in taking either of those guys. But now...makes you wonder
|
Even if we still have Haynesworth, if McCoy or Suh are there at 4 we should only consider two options:
1) Trading down (we'll have tons of suitors)
2) Drafting Suh or McCoy
Anything else would require reaching too far to fill a need IMO.
So i have a hypothetical situation for everyone. Lets say
where the Rams took Bradford, the Lions took Okung, and a team (perhaps Buffalo), fearing that we'd take Clausen, traded with Tampa Bay to draft the increasingly overrated QB. With both Suh and McCoy on the board, we might not end up with any offers to trade down and we'd be stuck at 4.
Who would you draft?