Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

#56fanatic · 03-27-2010, 08:33 AM

neither...and here is why

1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp)
2) why not develop our own receivers?
3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing
4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does.

This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.

03-27-2010, 08:33 AM	#68
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 51 Posts: 1,801	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? neither...and here is why 1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp) 2) why not develop our own receivers? 3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing 4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does. This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.