Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Beneil (diehard since 87) · 04-11-2010, 09:47 AM

I really don't see how it would be a good idea to lose Cooley OR Davis. Assuming Cooley is 100%, under Shannahan's offense, he's a probowler! As for Davis, I would argue that he's AS physicaly gifted, but not MORE physicaly gifted than Cooley, but Cooley DEFINATELY has better hands in the passing game. Though Davis had fewer drops than the 2nd time rookies (Thomas & Kelly) he wasn't as sure handed as Cooley.

That being said, without him, we'd have had fewer wins in Cooley's absense. Why NOT have two great TE's!?!?

04-11-2010, 09:47 AM	#1
Beneil (diehard since 87) Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 118	Re: Why not Fred Davis for Gaither? I really don't see how it would be a good idea to lose Cooley OR Davis. Assuming Cooley is 100%, under Shannahan's offense, he's a probowler! As for Davis, I would argue that he's AS physicaly gifted, but not MORE physicaly gifted than Cooley, but Cooley DEFINATELY has better hands in the passing game. Though Davis had fewer drops than the 2nd time rookies (Thomas & Kelly) he wasn't as sure handed as Cooley. That being said, without him, we'd have had fewer wins in Cooley's absense. Why NOT have two great TE's!?!?