Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

SBXVII · 05-04-2010, 10:32 AM

So right now we have...

#11 Thomas
#12 Kelly
#13 Armstrong
#18 Austin
#19 Wade
#83 Hagans
#84 Galloway
#87 R.Williams
#89 Moss

They should have gave Hagans #17. That way we would have had an 11,12,13, then 17, 18, 19. Then made Galloway #88 so we would have had 87, 88, and 89.

05-04-2010, 10:32 AM	#27
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: New Redskins Numbers So right now we have... #11 Thomas #12 Kelly #13 Armstrong #18 Austin #19 Wade #83 Hagans #84 Galloway #87 R.Williams #89 Moss They should have gave Hagans #17. That way we would have had an 11,12,13, then 17, 18, 19. Then made Galloway #88 so we would have had 87, 88, and 89.