Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan
I could give you approximately 35,000,000 reasons why it is.
Just think of it! How can you not be appalled by his behavior when he is already being paid a King's Ransom and he can't be bothered to show up for three days of work once or twice a month? I just don't see how that can be defended.
And please don't come back with the letter of the law union agreement argument because I doubt that the either the NFLPA or the owners could imagine a contract as front loaded as Haynesworth's when that agreement was signed. AH doesn't exactly need to go home to work a part-time job during the offseason to make ends meet, you know.
|
Because Mike Florio and Jason LaCanfora say it is a big deal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins
There is no reason to defend it, it is VOLUNTARY. Do you know what VOLUNTARY means? You guys got your panties in bunch because of how much is getting paid, so you expect him to be holding open the door for all of the other players. Get over his contract, the Redskins wrote it and he signed it. It is in the past.
|
Sadly, some people won't get over this. They are like bitter girlfriends, they are going to hold that grudge forever it seems.