Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud
It's not too often I side with PFT/Florio, but this is dead on IMO:
Haynesworth was promised before signing he could attack the quarterback when he came to Washington. The Redskins even considered trying to bring his old Titans defensive line coach Jim Washburn to town. Haynesworth had Snyder's ear.
Now that's all changed. He's being asked to occupy blockers, and he can't go around the coaches to get to Snyder anymore.
To this, we say: grow up. Things in life happen that are bigger than you. Coaches get fired, schemes change.
The Haynesworth camp would be better off not giving his side of the story.
Haynesworth feels "deceived" by Redskins | ProFootballTalk.com |
There really isn't a side of the story to give. There was a voluntary mini-camp. He's on a workout regiment in Tennessee that, in his estimation, prevented him from going.
I guess his side of the story might be "I'm a better player for not going". A lot of fans would call bs on that, I suppose. Saying "he should have been there" is too broad for my tastes. Maybe the best argument against Haynesworth's actions is that his head coach thought he should be there.
I guess I can see the selfishness in trying to make yourself the best player you can be (at the expense of...well, something), but I don't know. This is pretty ridiculous that the fans and media are more worked up about this than the Redskins are.