Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis
Argumentum ad hominem right from the get go. I didn't like Haynesworth silly antics in the offseason, especially when he had his chance to avoid being in the 3-4 if he really wanted to. But, these media firestorms are fertile ground for libel and defamation, territory I have no desire to wander into.
Besides, your statements have a "He has been blah blah" or "He is going to blah blah blah", which means that you are asserting a certain property to him, which means you are asserting a FACT. I dispute that your statement is actually FACT, and instead that is insuffcient evidence to deem it as fact, and that the actual facts point towards the opposite.
Yeah, it's quite obvious that Shanahan even allowing the possibility of letting him practice without needing to pass the test is a perfect indication of Albert malciously mailing it in, cooking it up, DESPITE advising from the medical staff. Sure, you can form opinions, but opinions formed from suspect assumptions deserve be critiqued, regardless of the subject matter's flaws. It makes perfect sense. Mike Shanahan, strict disciplinarian who should be just as angry with Haynesworth as he was with Plummer, yet he instead of squeezing the vicegrip tighter, allows the possibility of loosening it should the knee situation take a long enough time. It makes perfect sense. NOT.
And Albert Haynesworth, naive, immature, and maybe just a bit paranoid, probably felt the an anvil fall on his head as he realizes that most of the practice he's getting is at RDE. Like a little kid who tries too hard to make up for his mistake, he continues to dig himself a deeper hole, despite his an apparent desire .
"But these reporters don't know what they're talking about. Al is deliberately bombing because I WANNA BELIEVE IT. My judgement is right. Nice try, SCP, you're just best friends with Al Haynesworth. Your emotive ques tell me everything I need to know"
|