Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

GTripp0012 · 08-13-2010, 04:58 PM

The other problem is that you're creating a strawman that we all see a "star". I think, if his development had gone perfectly (and I think it's gone disasterously), Campbell could have been a multi-time pro-bowler.

But you wouldn't have expected to go perfectly (Tom Brady's development, I'd describe as perfect. Philip Rivers, ditto), as there's many uncontrollable variables in a QBs development. I don't think there was a high probability, coming out of Auburn, that Campbell was going to be a star, here or elsewhere. With that said, we've probably ruined him, to a degree, but he didn't exactly remind anyone of Sonny Jurgensen in his first camp.

I don't think you'll find anyone who "sees a star." Not one fan. Redskins or Raiders.

08-13-2010, 04:58 PM	#103
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Good for Campbell The other problem is that you're creating a strawman that we all see a "star". I think, if his development had gone perfectly (and I think it's gone disasterously), Campbell could have been a multi-time pro-bowler. But you wouldn't have expected to go perfectly (Tom Brady's development, I'd describe as perfect. Philip Rivers, ditto), as there's many uncontrollable variables in a QBs development. I don't think there was a high probability, coming out of Auburn, that Campbell was going to be a star, here or elsewhere. With that said, we've probably ruined him, to a degree, but he didn't exactly remind anyone of Sonny Jurgensen in his first camp. I don't think you'll find anyone who "sees a star." Not one fan. Redskins or Raiders. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.