Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

GTripp0012 · 08-13-2010, 09:43 PM

Regardless of what Collins was actually changing at the line in his few plays this season, is there any reason to believe the protection was actually better when he was in? I mean, Collins looked great when he was in and his first read on a play came open -- he was accurate and could stick it in there -- but seemed to me that things broke down for sir scrappy just as quickly as they did for Campbell, and usually with more disastrous results.

If the point is Collins seemed to the untrained eye to be more in charge before the snap than the starter, well, great. I don't care.

08-13-2010, 09:43 PM	#112
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 37 Posts: 15,994	Re: Good for Campbell Regardless of what Collins was actually changing at the line in his few plays this season, is there any reason to believe the protection was actually better when he was in? I mean, Collins looked great when he was in and his first read on a play came open -- he was accurate and could stick it in there -- but seemed to me that things broke down for sir scrappy just as quickly as they did for Campbell, and usually with more disastrous results. If the point is Collins seemed to the untrained eye to be more in charge before the snap than the starter, well, great. I don't care. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.