Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Schneed10 · 03-16-2005, 02:57 PM

I don't think they should change a thing with their front-office structure. here are the players this front office group "hit" on:

Marcus Washington
Cornelius Griffin
Shawn Springs
Clinton Portis
Walt Harris
Sean Taylor
Chris Cooley
Joe Salavae'a
Ron Warner
Garnell Wilds
Antonio Brown (I'd call him a hit at his salary level, just based on his little return duty last season)

Players they wiffed on:
Mark Brunell (bad cap consequences, though he restructured)
Mike Barrow (moderate cap consequences, though he restructured and could redeem himself)
Corey Raymer (small cap consequences)
Ralph Brown (no cap consequences)
Walter Rasby (no cap consequences)
Vaughn Parker (no cap consequences)

This front office group has added to our core, and most of the mistakes they've made have had minimal salary cap impact. The Coles situation is up for debate, but I don't think it's fair to call for a GM over that issue until you see the results on the field in 2005.

03-16-2005, 02:57 PM	#16
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 Posts: 12,458	Re: Final Say on Personnel I don't think they should change a thing with their front-office structure. here are the players this front office group "hit" on: Marcus Washington Cornelius Griffin Shawn Springs Clinton Portis Walt Harris Sean Taylor Chris Cooley Joe Salavae'a Ron Warner Garnell Wilds Antonio Brown (I'd call him a hit at his salary level, just based on his little return duty last season) Players they wiffed on: Mark Brunell (bad cap consequences, though he restructured) Mike Barrow (moderate cap consequences, though he restructured and could redeem himself) Corey Raymer (small cap consequences) Ralph Brown (no cap consequences) Walter Rasby (no cap consequences) Vaughn Parker (no cap consequences) This front office group has added to our core, and most of the mistakes they've made have had minimal salary cap impact. The Coles situation is up for debate, but I don't think it's fair to call for a GM over that issue until you see the results on the field in 2005.