[jsarno]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

You're difficult to argue with because you attack a bunch of different evidences provided for my point with no actual semblance of a counter argument. You also started out with a bunch of incorrect premises (including, but not limited to, a "knowledge" of the Broncos offense you proved not to have).

I disagree. I provided point after point to counter your points. For instance, like I said in the last post how you used an opinion of saying Marshall never made the top 10 in anything, and I refuted it (to no real comment from you).
Also, I have pointed out the exact same opinions as you in regards to Denver's offense. I find it hard to believe that you are knowledgable of football but refuse to understand that Royal underachieved last year despite being moved around. (again, this is common knowledge)

You have one common strategy: discredit what I am saying because I don't agree with you. Problem is, I don't even think you comprehend what I am saying. Either that, or you know I am right, and want to be argumentative anyway. Wouldn't be the first time.

Maybe I don't comprehend what you are saying, because your incorrect points are getting in the way. You have used a TON of opinion to prove your point, very little fact like I have. You're right, wouldn't be the first time you have done that. Clearly you want to believe what you want to believe, and that's your choice...but like I said, a medicre, or middle of the pack wr would never get a 5 year 50 million contract. Obviously the NFL agrees with me too.

Anyway, those are the facts of the situation. And we already pointed out above that when receivers are getting 150-175 targets in a year, the difference between 12.3 yards per catch and 13.5 yards per catch is A LOT. Over 16 games, it's close to a win.

I disagree that it's a win, especially when the guy that had 12.3 ypc had 1 more td. 12.3 ypc X 101 catches = 1242.3. 13.5 YPC X 101 catches = 1363.5. That's 121.2 yards per season. Or 7.575 yards per game. So you are trying to tell me (and others) that 7.5 yards a game is a win somewhere????? 7.5 yards per game is negligible.

And I can easily name 20 current receivers more valuable than Marshall. Johnson, and many others, would be on that list.

Only per your opinion, or skewed stats.

I think you overrate Andre Johnson a little bit, he's probably not the very best receiver in football, but he's certainly in the discussion and is probably one of the most difficult matchups in all of sports. And he's proven that on the field.

Maybe you're right...Fitzgerald deserves some credit too. But to put him under the top 2 or even 3 at worst is certainly off. Again, ask ANY NFL team.