Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

BrudLee · 03-22-2005, 08:54 AM

I don't blame Snyder or any other owners for trying to keep as much revenue as they can. The revenue sharing agreement already keeps teams like the Cardinals and Bengals (historically "cheap" teams) well in the black. Teams like Jacksonville rarely sell out their home games - yet they get an equal share of an enormous TV revenue deal. Why would Dan Snyder want to increase seating in his already large stadium if he will only be entitled to 1/32 of the profits gained by it?

Revenue sharing makes the NFL strong. However, the ability to create revenue outside the shared streams shouldn't be punished.

03-22-2005, 08:54 AM	#5
BrudLee Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE Posts: 3,494	Re: CBA Talks at "Dead End" I don't blame Snyder or any other owners for trying to keep as much revenue as they can. The revenue sharing agreement already keeps teams like the Cardinals and Bengals (historically "cheap" teams) well in the black. Teams like Jacksonville rarely sell out their home games - yet they get an equal share of an enormous TV revenue deal. Why would Dan Snyder want to increase seating in his already large stadium if he will only be entitled to 1/32 of the profits gained by it? Revenue sharing makes the NFL strong. However, the ability to create revenue outside the shared streams shouldn't be punished. __________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.