Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

aceinthehouse · 10-29-2010, 11:28 AM

We've been in the --- as least the last 10 years in turnovers..
I don't remember the last time the redskins finished the season in the + in turnovers. (long way to go still..I know)

Is it really a coincidence,that we are in the + the season we switch to the 3-4? I don't think so...

IMO...This team isn't 4-3 at this moment running the 4-3 as of old.

We don't get D-Halls strip and fumble return for a TD at the end of the 1/2 against Dallas.
and NO way Hall gets 4 INT's against the Bears and the 92 yarder for a TD....

That's 2 games alone that we won, just by the turnover itself.

So if we are running the 4-3 defense..this team is sitting at 2-5 right now imo...instead of 4-3
AT BEST!

10-29-2010, 11:28 AM	#23
aceinthehouse Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Springfield,Missouri Posts: 463	Re: Redskins move to 34 has paid off. We've been in the --- as least the last 10 years in turnovers.. I don't remember the last time the redskins finished the season in the + in turnovers. (long way to go still..I know) Is it really a coincidence,that we are in the + the season we switch to the 3-4? I don't think so... IMO...This team isn't 4-3 at this moment running the 4-3 as of old. We don't get D-Halls strip and fumble return for a TD at the end of the 1/2 against Dallas. and NO way Hall gets 4 INT's against the Bears and the 92 yarder for a TD.... That's 2 games alone that we won, just by the turnover itself. So if we are running the 4-3 defense..this team is sitting at 2-5 right now imo...instead of 4-3 AT BEST! __________________ The 1991 Redskins team,is the greatest team of all time. Their average margin of victory is the greatest of all Superbowl winning teams! HTTR!!