Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
^I didn't say it can't be done
|
Um that's exactly what you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
Like I've said hundreds of times, 2 TE's cant work in the NFL.
|
Don't be a hypocrite you said, stick with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok
but you won't ever see 2 TEs become big parts of the offense at the same time..
|
Wrong again my friend I listed 4 teams that use 2 TEs as a big part of their passing offense.(Packers, Patriots, Texans and Saints)
And there are plenty more teams that use 2 TEs a part of their base offense run sets/formations.
Quote:
|
And GB hardely used anyone before Finley got hurt,
|
I watch a lot of football, probably too much.
And i can tell you you're dead wrong.
The Packers have been using 2 TEs since last year.
Finley 55 catches
Lee 37
This year is different due to injury to 3 TEs but the numbers are:
Finley 21 catches
Lee, Quarless, Crabtree 17 catches.
Quote:
|
and as far as Saints go their TEs aren't anything special.. Shockey is done
|
Huh?
Wow that's a great argument: because you don't like their TEs that means their TEs aren't producing?
Well the numbers prove you wrong once again:
Shockey 31 catches
Dave Thomas 27
J Graham 8 catches
I could keep going with the Pats and Texans but i think i've made my point.
Just because we aren't making good use of Fred Davis doesn't mean it can't be done.
HTTR!