Thread: sam bradford
View Single Post
Old 12-15-2010, 12:50 PM   #25
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: sam bradford

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinster View Post
I made it 11 because 11 is close enough to 10 and roethlessberger and cutler were 11 while all the rest were top 5.
The small sample size is because the league is constantly evolving. I can't quantify how much the talent evaluation process of quarterbacks and the types that fit into what systems has evolved in the last 10 years, but I assume it is too much to accurately use a sample size any larger than 6-7 years.
lol how convenient for your argument
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.89862 seconds with 10 queries