Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins
I don't think DeAngelo Hall deserves it. Had it not been for that one game in Chicago, he most likely wouldn't be going. He still gets beat FAR too often to warrant a pro-bowl selection. Wasn't he one of the worst rated CBs in terms of giving up passes/TDs compared to others? Guy is completely overrated.
That said, I can see why they have Rak in there, but Fletcher's numbers have been going down since 2005. (solo tackles, not assists) My guess is that age is catching up to him.
London Fletcher, ILB for the Washington Redskins at NFL.com
2006- 104
2007- 100
2008 - 96
2009 - 95
2010 - 87 |
Note that this year we were in a 3-4 much of the time so he was splitting MLB tackles with McIntosh.
I think our best performer this year was pretty much a tie between Moss Landry and Fletch.
I think the probowl should consist of players selected by the players on each team 50% and coaches for players on other teams 50%
Fans in mass don't know jack....they usually just vote for a guy that got in the prior year...RAK did not deserve it this year IMO....just like Samuals didn't deserve his last pro bowl.
Not saying that I am not excited....just saying there are plenty of players that are left home that had stellar years because there is some more familiar name talked about during the games.
What I find interesting are the 1st probowl inductees...these guys are usually in completely on the merit of the year they had, unless it was for some slight in the past such as Fletch.
I just dont like this voting thing...reminds me of the BCS ranking problem.
I do trust coaches and players opinions though.