re: Updated Title: 8th Circuit Court Grants Stay, Lockout Reinstated
Although I am not certain, I would imagine that the standard NFL contract has many clauses that are tied to a CBA by reference. Unless the league decides to adopt those refrences, a lot of contract language will have to be rewritten or created from whole cloth
For example: "Player agrees to the code of conduct and penaltiies set forth in Article !V(a)(1), (2) of the 2006 Collective Bargaining Agreement."
Unless the referenced provision is adopted, the club would need to specifically define all the various infractions and penalties.
Thinking about it, it might be considered collusion if all the clubs adopt the same set of standard clauses. Also, this might present clubs an opportunity for getting very creative, in all sorts of small ways, in their contract language. For example, I believe that, under the old CBA, signing bonuses were guarranteed. Well, maybe clubs could now stick in clauses and/or language that gives them greater leeway in recouping bad signing bonuses.
I am just speculating on this. I have zero experience in anti-trust/labor law stuff - just some semi informed knowledge.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
|