Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule
FRPLG: one comment - I think both sides have had a moment(or more ) of bad faith moves. The tv money on the owners side was a highly antagonistic move. The pre-expiration disclaimer/antitrust suit was just as bad faith on the players side. It is hard to believe either has had pure good faith motive but instead both simply have played along fairly predictable lines.
|
Honestly I'm not sure it was a bad faith move as much as it was either dumb (as in they didn't ever actually consider that it was wrong) or they weren't convinced it wasn't kosher. But I would certainly concede that neither side has the claim to being totally "right" or even close.